Newsletter Archive
Don't Let The Door Hit You On The Way Out: Canada Slashing the Number of New Permanent Residents, Tens of Thousands of Temporary Residents in Canada Will Have to Leave
- by Ronalee Carey Law
October 2024
The 2025-2027 Immigration Levels Plan has been announced. And it was a bombshell.
The Immigration Levels Plan must be reported to Parliament by November 1st of each year. In it, the government sets out its target admissions for each immigration category. To assist with long-term planning, levels are set for three years, but each year, the levels can be adjusted despite what was set for years 2 and 3 previously. So, the numbers for 2025 and 2026, as set out in the 2024-2026 plan, were not set in stone.
Immigration Minister Miller hinted that a reduction in the levels was under consideration. What no one expected was the sheer drop in numbers – 21% over the next three years from previous targets.
Here are some examples of how the levels plan will change for 2025:
2025 levels in the 2024-2026 Plan |
2025 levels in the 2025-2027 plan |
|
Provincial nomination programs (all provinces combined) |
120,000 |
55,000 |
Spouses, Partners and Children |
84,000 |
70,000 |
Protected Persons in Canada and dependents abroad |
29,000 |
20,000 |
Federal High Skilled |
117,500 |
Federal Economic Priorities 41,700 (category-based Express Entry draws) In-Canada Focus (primarily Canadian Experience Class) 82,980 Overall total: 124,680 |
Further cuts are in store for 2026-2027. For example, the Spouses, Partners and Children category will be reduced further to 65,500 in 2026.
Despite the best intentions, there are categories of immigration that the Canadian government cannot control. For example, it cannot control the number of Canadians who choose to marry non-Canadians. It also cannot control the number of individuals who claim refugee protection from within Canada; such claims are based on events in other countries. The government is simply creating a backlog and increasing processing times by capping the numbers on these categories. If 65,501 people apply to sponsor their spouse or child in 2026, application number 65,501 will simply be shoved off to 2027; the government cannot deny a sponsorship application because it has hit its numbers for the year. The category for protected persons is the same. Deciding who should be granted refugee protection in Canada is the purview of the Immigration and Refugee Board, not IRCC. Once a person is granted protection, they are entitled to apply for permanent residence, including for their family members abroad (spouses, partners, and dependent children.) IRCC must process their applications, but it can choose how long to let them languish in the processing queue. Already, protected persons have waited at least a year, often much longer, for their refugee hearing. Once accepted, currently, they must wait another 53 months (that’s 4.41 years!) for their family members to come to Canada. Imagine that number increasing exponentially.
I don’t see any room in the new levels plan for ‘general draws’ in Express Entry for the Federal Skilled Worker Program. Foreign workers outside of Canada will only be accepted if they fit one of the categories: health care occupations, trade occupations, and French-language proficiency. However, overall, the ‘Federal High Skilled’ quota is increasing from the previous target.
The 2025-2027 Immigration Levels Plan also introduces targets for workers and international students for the first time. International student caps were introduced earlier this year. No more than 305,900 international students will be admitted in each of the next three years. The number of temporary foreign workers is set at 367,750 for 2025, will drop to 210,700 in 2026, and then increase slightly to 237,700 in 2027. However, that presumes that numbers won’t change in the 2026-2028 Immigration Levels Plan (which may be introduced by a new government pending the outcome of the next election). Overall, Canada’s population will decrease, with 445,901 fewer temporary workers and international students in 2025 and 445,662 fewer in 2026. The intention is to have no more than 5% of the Canadian population comprised of temporary workers and students. Still, since asylum claimants are entitled to work permits, and since the government cannot control how many people claim asylum (as it is a right under international law), their 5% target is not really within their control.
The Backgrounder to the Immigration Levels Plans states the goal of the cuts: This year’s levels plan reduces permanent resident targets starting in 2025 and forecasts decreases for the following two years, resulting in a pause in population growth in the short term to achieve well-managed, sustainable growth and economic prosperity for the long term.
Unsurprisingly, the change has been widely denounced. The Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association released a statement condemning the cuts, saying that Canada’s need for immigrants has not changed with our aging population and decreasing birth rate. The Canadian Council for Refugees accuses Canada of betraying refugees, stating that the increased waiting period for family members to come to Canada will rob children of their futures and destroy families, and that “People will lose their lives.” This is not rhetoric. I happened to one of my clients this year. Only he could get a visa to Canada; he had to leave his wife and children behind, though they were also in danger. His refugee claim was accepted, and he applied for permanent residence, including his wife and children in his application. His wife was recently murdered by the same individuals who had threatened him and caused him to flee. Had I managed to get them to Canada sooner, the children would not have lost their mother.
Further, without question, many of the close to million temporary residents whose status will expire in the next three years will not leave Canada. Canada is overly optimistic, or perhaps simply naive, to think a policy change will be enough to convince people to leave as required. When living in Canada without status is less precarious than life at home, people will have no incentive to leave. The Canada Border Services Agency will be hard-pressed to round up and remove the close to 1,000,000 people expected to leave in the next two years. A rise in the number of individuals without status in Canada is a problem the government is creating for itself. Pundits suggest that Canada would be better served by extending the legal status of those in Canada and converting them to permanent residence over time rather than making such drastic moves. It will be up to voters in the next election to decide whether they agree with the government’s approach.
Fears of Immigration Policy Change After Elections
- by Ronalee Carey Law
September 2024
Each time Canada or the USA heads into a federal/presidential election period, the number of inquiries I get increases. When an American presidential election is coming up, I get calls mostly from Democratic supporters hoping to move to Canada should a Republican president be nominated. For Canadian elections, the calls are from temporary residents hoping to apply for permanent residence, worried that a change in government will result in less favourable immigration policies. On September 4th, Canada’s second largest political party ended an agreement to prop up a minority governing party. We are only one confidence vote away from a general election. With the US presidential election scheduled for November 5th, I’m hearing from many antsy individuals on both sides of the border.
Canada has had a liberal government since 2013. During their time in power, the number of new permanent residents increased from 259,000 in 2013 to 471,771 in 2023. The number of study permits issued went from 111,865 to 684,385. In 2013, the number of temporary foreign workers in Canada was 649,700; in 2021, it was 963,400.
In 2023, the number of new jobs created in Canada was less than that of new work permits issued. Unemployment rose in August 2024, and it was a tough job market for students this past summer.
With an election looming, the governing Liberal party has heeded public opinion to lessen the number of temporary residents in Canada. On September 26th, new restrictions for work permit applications came into effect. These measures follow a cap placed on study permit applications announced in January. The current immigration minister has also promised cuts to the permanent resident program.
If a Conservative government is voted in, more changes will undoubtedly come. The leader of the party has promised further cuts, tying the number of new permanent residents to the number of new homes built and considering other factors such as access to health care and jobs. Statements like that are guaranteed to make permanent resident hopefuls jumpy. ‘May you live in interesting times’ is never less welcome than when it is your future that will be affected.
Changes Coming for ‘Semi-Skilled’ Temporary Foreign Workers
- by Ronalee Carey Law
August 2024
I was on vacation last week. For the fourth consecutive summer, I spent a week on a catamaran with my best friend and her father, the spriest 86-year-old I’ve ever met. I am originally from northern Ontario, and returning to that part of Canada feeds my soul in ways no other vacation could. It also meant limited internet access, forcing me to take a break from my inbox. This was both a blessing and a curse, as I had 274 emails to wade through upon returning to the office.
The remote parts of Canada are unfamiliar for immigrants who have settled in Canada’s bigger cities and didn’t grow up taking Canadian geography lessons. Dana, my favourite fitness instructor, wondered why I’d missed class last week. She’s originally from Syria. I told her I’d been sailing on Lake Superior. She looked quizzical and asked me where that was. (For the similarly uninitiated, Lake Superior is the largest freshwater lake in the world and touches the shorelines of Ontario, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.)
On my first trip in 2020, I arrived at the airport in Thunder Bay and immediately noticed a change from my visits to the city as a child to visit my grandparents. Thunder Bay is adjacent to the Fort William First Nation and home to individuals from numerous indigenous groups. However, until recent years, the settler population was comprised mostly of European stock. The arrival of temporary foreign workers and international students has changed the composition of the population. This has changed the hospitality and services industry. On our last day in the city, we enjoyed traditional Ghanaian dishes from a local restaurant, which would not have been a dining option during my youth.
Thunder Bay has benefited from the Rural and Northern Immigration Pilot, which will soon become permanent as the Rural Immigration Program. It has also profited from an increase in the issuance of study and work permits. But the temporary resident boom is soon to be over. Canada recently put a cap on the number of study permits it will issue and will do the same for work permits.
However, Canada also plans to create a new permanent resident program for semi-skilled workers. This will allow some of the temporary foreign workers in Thunder Bay’s hospitality and service industries, amongst others, to stay in Canada permanently rather than living precariously from work permit to work permit.
Those lucky immigrants will be able to enjoy the region’s wonderful attractions, including walking across Canada’s longest suspension bridge, searching for treasures at Amythyst Mine Panorama, and hiking to the top of the giant in Sleeping Giant Provincial Park.
The Canadian immigration system is complex and constantly changing. However, it has long been criticized for treating temporary foreign workers as a ‘disposable workforce.’ We’ve yet to see the proposed new program; details will be announced this fall. I’m hopeful it will be a turning point for immigrant communities all across Canada.
Around the World, Without Leaving Canada
- by Ronalee Carey Law
July 2024
I am not well-travelled, which might seem surprising for an immigration lawyer. I spent a month in Russia with a group from McMaster University, where I was an undergraduate student. We had lectures in the morning and then toured the city in the afternoons with students from the University of Moscow. It was the longest time I’ve ever spent outside Canada and the furthest I’ve ever gone from home. Outside of trips to the USA, I’ve only otherwise been to countries in the Caribbean.